-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suggested "update frequency" field #80
Comments
If I understand correctly, you consider this field for “in-house” updates, i.e. for your own data which you need to update regularly (or mark as “one-off” / “doesn’t have to be updated”), so you can see for which datasets updates have to be scheduled? |
Yes - that's exactly it. |
This doesn’t seem to be difficult to implement. However, I don’t know what @Gustry thinks about it – it is another data field for users to understand and for the developers to maintain. What values would you put in there? Similar to publication frequency (yearly, monthly, etc.) and something like “no updates necessary” (for one-off datasets)? |
You mean something like the field
Present glossary for this field is
|
Yes a very similar or identical glossary would be useful should this new field be implemented. @effjot - a "no updates required" option would also make sense. From a practical perspective, if I were to have a field such as this in place, I could then query it alongside "Data last update" to see which datasets require updates. For example if update frequency = monthly, but the data last update = 3 months ago, I could flag that that particular dataset is "out of date". |
Hello,
As a "GIS Administrator" using your plugin (thanks for making it), it would be useful to have an "update frequency" field. This would help keep track of datasets which require regular updating or identify those that have been produced as a one-off. On many occasions this differs from publication frequency, which is often determined by a 3rd party.
Perhaps it could go under the "Data last update" field?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: