You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be nice if an RMS roughness metric was obtained for the background of each image.
Describe the solution you would like.
The filters stage obtains a background only mask (inverse of foreground mask) which could be used to obtain this using some code @SylviaWhittle has previously written. This could be appended to the image_stats output.
Describe the alternatives you have considered.
No response
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I just remembered - we already have RMS roughness for the whole image, was written a while back. Adding background roughness will just be a case of passing a masked array (and possibly updating the function to accept masked arrays), roughness_rms function from TopoStats.statistics
Is your feature request related to a problem?
It would be nice if an RMS roughness metric was obtained for the background of each image.
Describe the solution you would like.
The filters stage obtains a background only mask (inverse of foreground mask) which could be used to obtain this using some code @SylviaWhittle has previously written. This could be appended to the image_stats output.
Describe the alternatives you have considered.
No response
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: