Skip to content

Add Pathways Recipe Support for Scale Testing #1220

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

SujeethJinesh
Copy link
Collaborator

@SujeethJinesh SujeethJinesh commented Jan 31, 2025

Description

This PR contains the following changes:

  1. Adds the following 2 recipes:

    a. Benchmarking Pathways and McJAX code
    b. Long running test on Pathways.

    This is done to improve code/recipe sharing between developers during testing and make benchmarking simpler by
    sharing a single, well-defined config. This will be used for testing and verification on v6e capacity.

  2. By default allows all configs to run pathways (enable_single_controller, disable zarr3, enable_pathways_goodput etc.), with additional configs that can be added by the user with pathways_tuning_params.

  3. Allow removing problematic XLA flags for pathways with pathways_xla_flag_options or subsequently adding xla flags to different pods.

  4. Cleans up a lot of old pathways specific configs and adds some new ones as well.

Tests

Run multiple rounds on multiple v6e clusters

Checklist

Before submitting this PR, please make sure (put X in square brackets):

  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • I have necessary comments in my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have run end-to-end tests tests and provided workload links above if applicable.
  • I have made or will make corresponding changes to the doc if needed.

@SujeethJinesh SujeethJinesh changed the title Add Pathways Benchmarking Recipes for Scale Testing Add Pathways Benchmarking Recipes for Scale Testing (and fix regression from #1094) Jan 31, 2025
@SujeethJinesh SujeethJinesh force-pushed the sujinesh/add_scale_testing_scripts branch from 38aed8e to 4619286 Compare January 31, 2025 07:32
@SujeethJinesh SujeethJinesh changed the title Add Pathways Benchmarking Recipes for Scale Testing (and fix regression from #1094) Add Pathways Benchmarking Recipes for Scale Testing (and fix bugs) Jan 31, 2025
@SujeethJinesh SujeethJinesh force-pushed the sujinesh/add_scale_testing_scripts branch 4 times, most recently from 59799d7 to 0c9e709 Compare January 31, 2025 22:14
@SujeethJinesh SujeethJinesh force-pushed the sujinesh/add_scale_testing_scripts branch 3 times, most recently from 68bde9d to c344cd0 Compare February 13, 2025 01:34
@SujeethJinesh SujeethJinesh changed the title Add Pathways Benchmarking Recipes for Scale Testing (and fix bugs) Add Pathways Recipe Support for Scale Testing (and fix bugs) Feb 13, 2025
@SujeethJinesh SujeethJinesh force-pushed the sujinesh/add_scale_testing_scripts branch 4 times, most recently from e5f9c2e to 7888e57 Compare February 19, 2025 00:38
@SujeethJinesh SujeethJinesh force-pushed the sujinesh/add_scale_testing_scripts branch 3 times, most recently from ee2a336 to 72df4d8 Compare February 19, 2025 21:39
@SujeethJinesh SujeethJinesh changed the title Add Pathways Recipe Support for Scale Testing (and fix bugs) Add Pathways Recipe Support for Scale Testing Feb 19, 2025
@SujeethJinesh SujeethJinesh force-pushed the sujinesh/add_scale_testing_scripts branch from 72df4d8 to c0b018d Compare February 19, 2025 21:59
@SujeethJinesh SujeethJinesh force-pushed the sujinesh/add_scale_testing_scripts branch from c0b018d to b6c7658 Compare February 19, 2025 22:44
@SujeethJinesh SujeethJinesh marked this pull request as ready for review February 19, 2025 22:44
@SujeethJinesh SujeethJinesh force-pushed the sujinesh/add_scale_testing_scripts branch from e070b70 to 1c1dc1e Compare February 21, 2025 18:12
Copy link
Collaborator

@RoshaniN RoshaniN left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Sujeeth!

@SujeethJinesh SujeethJinesh force-pushed the sujinesh/add_scale_testing_scripts branch 3 times, most recently from 965eb9a to 2279475 Compare February 21, 2025 22:00
Copy link
Collaborator

@shauryagup shauryagup left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Sujeeth!

@SujeethJinesh SujeethJinesh force-pushed the sujinesh/add_scale_testing_scripts branch 4 times, most recently from c292d23 to d2e9450 Compare February 23, 2025 05:37
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@SujeethJinesh SujeethJinesh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the review!

@SujeethJinesh SujeethJinesh force-pushed the sujinesh/add_scale_testing_scripts branch from d2e9450 to 052f650 Compare February 25, 2025 21:43
@SujeethJinesh SujeethJinesh force-pushed the sujinesh/add_scale_testing_scripts branch 3 times, most recently from d40bff8 to d1fdb9c Compare February 28, 2025 22:48
@SujeethJinesh SujeethJinesh force-pushed the sujinesh/add_scale_testing_scripts branch from d1fdb9c to 8eba24b Compare February 28, 2025 23:04
Copy link
Collaborator

@dipannita08 dipannita08 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks so much!

@SujeethJinesh SujeethJinesh force-pushed the sujinesh/add_scale_testing_scripts branch from 8eba24b to a410df6 Compare February 28, 2025 23:35
Enable metrics collection

Revert "Enable metrics collection"

This reverts commit b3d2fc0.
@SujeethJinesh SujeethJinesh force-pushed the sujinesh/add_scale_testing_scripts branch from 8d4b5ea to f164e8b Compare March 1, 2025 07:39
@SujeethJinesh
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closing as this PR has been merged in as part of another commit.

@bvandermoon bvandermoon mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2025
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants