You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am testing the GaMMA associator to associate picks of shallow seismic events, including quarry blasts following the examples provided e.g. in SeisBench. This are the parameters in the config dictionary:
ev_east and ev_north are the event easting and northing, which I know beforehand.
The parameter selection does not seem to be optimal for the picks I am trying to associate, as many picks which clearly correspond to my event of interest are ignored, as you can see in this plot:
Do you have any suggestions?
Cheers!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@Cthuulhaa This is a bit strange. Could you set these parameters, 'max_sigma11': 2.0, 'max_sigma22': 1.0, 'max_sigma12': 1.0, to very large values, basically turn off the filtering. The filtering is independent of the association step, just to filter out bad picks. Because GaMMA is a clustering method, basically every pick will be assigned to some clusters. The clusters that do not fit the filtering criteria like min_picks_per_eq: 3 will be removed. You can check your region range is correctly set, the associated event locations are not at the edge of your domain.
Hi,
I am testing the GaMMA associator to associate picks of shallow seismic events, including quarry blasts following the examples provided e.g. in SeisBench. This are the parameters in the config dictionary:
ev_east
andev_north
are the event easting and northing, which I know beforehand.The parameter selection does not seem to be optimal for the picks I am trying to associate, as many picks which clearly correspond to my event of interest are ignored, as you can see in this plot:
Do you have any suggestions?
Cheers!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: