You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello,
Thank for your great work. I have a question. When I replicated the work, I got a better result than 3.92 on MPIIFaceGaze. However, when I tested your pre-training results, I got a 4.17. I want to konw is 3.92 the best result ?Are all the results performed on 448 *448 pictures?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello, Thank for your great work. I have a question. When I replicated the work, I got a better result than 3.92 on MPIIFaceGaze. However, when I tested your pre-training results, I got a 4.17. I want to konw is 3.92 the best result ?Are all the results performed on 448 *448 pictures?
Hello,When I trained his model, there were many bugs, and based on some values that were not defined, after modification, I got the wrong Mae: 0.041. How do you reproduce it? Can you analyze your code with me? My email: a847990008@icloud.com Thank you very much.
Hello, when I replicated the work as the parameters the writer provided, I got 4.9°, where the error is big. I don't know why. So, could I have a communication with you?
My email: 726804161@shu.edu.cn
Tks!
Hello,
Thank for your great work. I have a question. When I replicated the work, I got a better result than 3.92 on MPIIFaceGaze. However, when I tested your pre-training results, I got a 4.17. I want to konw is 3.92 the best result ?Are all the results performed on 448 *448 pictures?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: