-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
Copy pathNaval.bib
174 lines (155 loc) · 8.22 KB
/
Naval.bib
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
% Encoding: UTF-8
@InBook{Corbett1984,
chapter = {Excerpts from Some Principles of Maritime Strategy},
pages = {156-174},
title = {The Art and Practice of Military Strategy},
publisher = {National Defense University},
year = {1984},
author = {Sir Julian Corbett},
editor = {George Edward Thibault},
}
@Article{Crisher2011,
author = {Brian Benjamin Crisher and Mark Souva},
title = {Power at Sea: A Naval Power Dataset, 1965-2011},
journal = {International Interactions},
year = {2011},
}
@Article{Bolks2000,
author = {Sean Bolks and Richard J. Stoll},
title = {The Arms Acquisition Process: The Effect of Internal and External Constraints on Arms Race Dynamics},
journal = {The Journal of Conflict Resolution},
year = {2000},
volume = {44},
number = {5},
pages = {580--603},
issn = {00220027, 15528766},
url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/174645},
__markedentry = {[packe:]},
abstract = {A new approach to address oversights in the traditional arms race literature is presented. It involves five factors that have not been previously applied to arms races. The focus of military capability is not expenditures but weapons counts. The entire set of major powers is modeled as a system. A factor controlling for the level of environmental threat faced by each state is included. Domestic factors are included in the decision-making calculus of the state. It is assumed that states use simple decision rules rather than a complex set of calculations to make their decisions. The authors use this approach to test a system of equations that model the number of capital ships of the major powers from 1860 to 1986 in different time periods. Results indicate that the overall approach has a good deal of validity.},
publisher = {Sage Publications, Inc.},
}
@Article{McBride1997,
author = {William M. McBride},
title = {The Unstable Dynamics of a Strategic Technology: Disarmament, Unemployment, and the Interwar Battleship},
journal = {Technology and Culture},
year = {1997},
volume = {38},
number = {2},
pages = {386--423},
issn = {0040165X, 10973729},
url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/3107127},
publisher = {[The Johns Hopkins University Press, Society for the History of Technology]},
}
@Book{Gray2007,
title = {War Peace and International Relations: An Introduction to Strategic History},
publisher = {Routledge},
year = {2007},
author = {Colin S. Gray},
}
@Book{Keegan1993,
author = {John Keegan},
title = {A History of Warfare},
year = {1993},
publisher = {Vintage Books},
}
@Book{Mahan2004,
author = {Alfred Mahan},
title = {Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660-1783},
year = {2004},
publisher = {Barnes and Noble inc.},
}
@Article{Maiolo2008,
author = {Joseph A. Maiolo},
title = {Anglo-Soviet Naval Armaments Diplomacy before the Second World War},
journal = {The English Historical Review},
year = {2008},
volume = {123},
number = {501},
pages = {351--378},
issn = {00138266, 14774534},
url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/20108456},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
}
@InBook{Crowl1986,
author = {Philip A. Crowl and Gordon A. Craig and Felix Gilbert},
title = {Alfred Thayer Mahan: The Naval Historian},
booktitle = {Makers of Modern Strategy from Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age},
year = {1986},
publisher = {Princeton University Press},
isbn = {9780691027647},
pages = {444--478},
url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv8xnhvw.20},
abstract = {<p>Writing of his years in Washington as secretary of war (1940-1945), Henry L. Stimson ruefully recalled “the peculiar psychology of the Navy Department, which frequently seemed to retire from the realm of logic into a dim religious world in which Neptune was God, Mahan his prophet, and the United States Navy the only true Church.”¹ The “prophet” alluded to in Stimson’s left-handed tribute had then been in his grave for thirty years. He had spent most of his adult life on active duty as a commissioned officer in the United States Navy, retiring as a captain in 1896. Only after</p>},
}
@Book{Calder2007,
author = {Kent E. Calder},
title = {Embattled Garrisons: Comparative Base Politics and American Globalism},
year = {2007},
publisher = {Princeton University Press},
isbn = {9780691134635},
url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7s684},
abstract = {<p>The overseas basing of troops has been a central pillar of American military strategy since World War II--and a controversial one. Are these bases truly essential to protecting the United States at home and securing its interests abroad--for example in the Middle East-or do they needlessly provoke anti-Americanism and entangle us in the domestic woes of host countries?<em>Embattled Garrisons</em>takes up this question and examines the strategic, political, and social forces that will determine the future of American overseas basing in key regions around the world.</p><p>Kent Calder traces the history of overseas bases from their beginnings in World War II through the cold war to the present day, comparing the different challenges the United States, Britain, France, and the Soviet Union have confronted. Providing the broad historical and comparative context needed to understand what is at stake in overseas basing, Calder gives detailed case studies of American bases in Japan, Italy, Turkey, the Philippines, Spain, South Korea, the Balkans, Afghanistan, and Iraq. He highlights the vulnerability of American bases to political shifts in their host nations--in emerging democracies especially--but finds that an American presence can generally be tolerated when identified with political liberation rather than imperial succession.</p><p><em>Embattled Garrisons</em>shows how the origins of basing relationships crucially shape long-term prospects for success, and it offers a means to assess America's prospects for a sustained global presence in the future.</p>},
}
@Article{Wolters2011,
author = {Timothy Wolters},
title = {Recapitalizing the Fleet: A Material Analysis of Late-Nineteenth-Century U.S. Naval Power},
journal = {Technology and Culture},
year = {2011},
volume = {52},
number = {1},
pages = {103--126},
issn = {0040165X, 10973729},
url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/23020458},
publisher = {[The Johns Hopkins University Press, Society for the History of Technology]},
}
@Article{Walters2000,
author = {William D. Walters},
title = {American Naval Shipbuilding, 1890-1989},
journal = {Geographical Review},
year = {2000},
volume = {90},
number = {3},
pages = {418--431},
issn = {00167428},
url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/3250861},
publisher = {[American Geographical Society, Wiley]},
}
@Book{Modelski1987,
author = {George Modelski},
title = {Long Cylces in World Politics},
year = {1987},
publisher = {University of Washington Press},
}
@Book{Organski1968,
author = {A.F.K. Organski},
title = {World Politics},
year = {1968},
publisher = {Random House},
}
@Book{Smith2012,
author = {Martin Smith},
title = {Power in a Changing Global Order: The U.S., Russia, and China},
year = {2012},
publisher = {Polity Press},
}
@Book{Modelski1988,
author = {George Modelski and William Thompson},
title = {Seapower in global politics, 1494-1993},
year = {1988},
publisher = {University of Washington},
}
@Article{Modelski1978,
author = {George Modelski},
title = {The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation-State},
journal = {Comparative Studies in Society and History},
year = {1978},
volume = {20},
number = {2},
pages = {214--235},
issn = {00104175, 1471633X},
url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/178047},
__markedentry = {[packe:6]},
publisher = {[Society for Comparative Studies in Society and History, Cambridge University Press]},
}
@Comment{jabref-meta: databaseType:biblatex;}
>>>>>>> 5d1935584960aa03600d5cf17cc8f78b299e50ea