-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improving cost of water by considering pumping/extraction cost #4
Comments
these are water costs? On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:51 AM, ipsitakumar notifications@github.com
Upmanu Lall http://www.columbia.edu/~ula2/ |
This is cost of water supply |
hmm On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 5:17 PM, ipsitakumar notifications@github.com
Upmanu Lall http://www.columbia.edu/~ula2/ |
Hi Ipsita, Another source for treatment costs: McGiveney and Kawamura 2008 'Cost On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 5:22 PM, ulall notifications@github.com wrote:
Maura Allaire Columbia Water Center |
Following our last meeting, we will replace national fixed values to reflect extraction cost. GW: height of water table are now available in each county. We will assume a cost linear to the depth to the water table and to energy price. |
From operational-problem: "This is used for cost calculations for surface water. The pressure of delivery for urban should be 20 m, and for irrigation should be 5 m." |
We now use the AWWA regression to estimate water costs, and an RA (Harshit?) is working on improving this with per-meter pumping costs. @LaurelineJ Can you add Harshit to our github organization and assign this task? I'm going to set the task to the WSEC milestone. |
Xiangyu has already done this work (you can find it here). Using ground water table depth information from a global hydrogeological model calibrated based on USGS data or using the raw USGS data directly, Xiangyu sees no significant correlation between cost and depth:
This issue is a sub-part of the WIP: watercost pull request. I think we can drop this thread. |
This regression isn't what I was expecting. Don't we want to regress If that produces negative values for any of the terms, then you need to use nnnpls or its Julia equivalent. The last commit I see on that PR is a year ago. |
Getting cost data at one of these levels
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: