Replies: 9 comments 1 reply
-
@camwebb I think I released it - let me know if it works now. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks @Jegelewicz, but no, still blocked. This is an IP for the major telco in Alaska - ACS (alaskacommunications.com). Related: I very frequently spend several minutes finding a way to reach Arctos - so many IPs I use are blocked. And then I need to find and delete the CFID cookie if I have previously tried from a blocked IP. Is the security risk really worth the significant inconvenience users experience trying to access Arctos? Has the IP Blocking policy been revisited recently? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Well, I think I have exhausted my options - It looks like it is active to me, but I am kinda guessing at what to do. @mkoo is there anyone else who knows what to do? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I unblocked all IPs in 69.161- (in Arctos management) so should be ok-- please let us know. You can usually unblock yourself too although there may a little delay. I can pop this over to D and CJ to allow this subnet since it's not displaying bad behaviour and you guys use it regularly |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@mkoo Thanks! Works now.
I don't have the required Arctos permissions, I'm afraid. Is there any likelihood that the IP Blacklist policy might ever be reconsidered and liberalized? It certainly makes Arctos less friendly to use. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Moving this here; it could definitely use further discussion.
You shouldn't need them. You - anyone - can fill out a form and release yourself, unless you've found yourself on a had-blocked network, which is comparatively rare.
It would be fabulous if you could elaborate on that. That should not be the case, I'll try to fix it if I can. (I've blocked myself probably thousands of times - mostly intentionally! - and never experienced this.)
It could definitely be changed, but that can't result in Arctos being less secure unless it's accompanied by significant resources to compensate (and those could take several forms). We see thousands of occasionally-targeted malicious requests almost every day, and Arctos mostly weathers them because the block policies have been designed to do just that. Given our actual resources, my preference would be to require login for all Arctos access. That's not entirely unusual these days, and would serve about the same purpose as the "associated traffic" blocks that most users see. IDK if that would be a more-friendly approach than the current or not. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks @dustymc for opening this discussion.
100% repeatable (for me). (Firefox on Linux)
Then I usually log in, and switch VPN back on, and the blocked IP is then not blocked (I assume because of the new |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I had assumed that the form you (and @mkoo above) refer to is: https://arctos.database.museum/Admin/blocklist.cfm. I get an "Unauthorized" for that form. I can't find anything in the handbook, searching on 'blocked IP'. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks and AHA! @camwebb, I'll see what I can do about that (without opening us up to a DDOS attack). I had not anticipated swapping IPs without establishing a new session (or at least not non-malicious versions of that!).
Nope, any form. https://arctos-test.tacc.utexas.edu/blockme.php should look like... and filling that out (or clicking the link on test) should lead to.... Grab some coffee (because I don't have the resources to not cache while surviving even normal daily attacks), come back and you should have access. (And the typo is fixed for next release.) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
restricted IP: 69.161.16.16
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions