Add permit available to public search terms

[campmlc]

Currently this is only searchable with operator access. We are funneling this info to GGBN using the vocabulary "permit available, permit not required"; also "permit type". It would be good to have the same search parameters available in Arctos, at least for tissues collected after 2014, for Nagoya purposes.

[dustymc]

This is a currently social problem; I'm un-assigning myself until it becomes a technical problem.

• Do we want to provide permit search functionality for non-operator users?
• If so, by what criteria?
• Do we want to display something about permits somewhere in results or specimen detail?
• If so, what and where?

[jldunnum]

I think I would prefer to keep most details within the management access level. Don't see why public should be searching our permits.

…

______________________________________________________________ Jonathan L. Dunnum Ph.D. Senior Collection Manager Division of Mammals, Museum of Southwestern Biology University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131 (505) 277-9262 Fax (505) 277-1351 MSB Mammals website: http://www.msb.unm.edu/mammals/index.html Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/MSBDivisionofMammals Shipping Address: Museum of Southwestern Biology Division of Mammals University of New Mexico CERIA Bldg 83, Room 204 Albuquerque, NM 87131

________________________________ From: dustymc <notifications@github.com> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 6:52:04 PM To: ArctosDB/arctos Cc: Subscribed Subject: Re: [ArctosDB/arctos] Add permit available to public search terms (#1372) This is a currently social problem; I'm un-assigning myself until it becomes a technical problem. * Do we want to provide permit search functionality for non-operator users? * If so, by what criteria? * Do we want to display something about permits somewhere in results or specimen detail? * If so, what and where? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1372 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQengxNXVdtdA-mLvPDN-vo0qUDWGGTdks5tBxbEgaJpZM4RGP9P>.

[campmlc]

To clarify, I am suggesting we only add the fields that we are already making publicly available via GGBN. This would allow researchers to use both Arctos and GGBN to find the same info. These fields are "permit available, permit not required, and permit type". This information is required to comply with the Nagoya protocol.

…

On Dec 19, 2017 9:55 AM, "jldunnum" ***@***.***> wrote: I think I would prefer to keep most details within the management access level. Don't see why public should be searching our permits. ______________________________________________________________ Jonathan L. Dunnum Ph.D. Senior Collection Manager Division of Mammals, Museum of Southwestern Biology University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131 (505) 277-9262 Fax (505) 277-1351 MSB Mammals website: http://www.msb.unm.edu/mammals/index.html Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/MSBDivisionofMammals Shipping Address: Museum of Southwestern Biology Division of Mammals University of New Mexico CERIA Bldg 83, Room 204 Albuquerque, NM 87131 ________________________________ From: dustymc ***@***.***> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 6:52:04 PM To: ArctosDB/arctos Cc: Subscribed Subject: Re: [ArctosDB/arctos] Add permit available to public search terms (#1372) This is a currently social problem; I'm un-assigning myself until it becomes a technical problem. * Do we want to provide permit search functionality for non-operator users? * If so, by what criteria? * Do we want to display something about permits somewhere in results or specimen detail? * If so, what and where? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://github.com/ ArctosDB/arctos#1372#issuecomment-352615216>, or mute the thread< https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQengxNXVdtdA-mLvPDN- vo0qUDWGGTdks5tBxbEgaJpZM4RGP9P>. — You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1372 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOH0hDsT2qKDlCXA-3vpG6kb24MAvywJks5tB-qCgaJpZM4RGP9P> .

[dustymc]

Tabling, doesn't seem to be interest.

[campmlc]

Still relevant. @jldunnum