Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support the Integration of Remote Results Files That Are Available through HTTP #18

Open
gkapfham opened this issue Aug 24, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request on-hold Low priority

Comments

@gkapfham
Copy link
Collaborator

Right now the chasten integrate command only allows the specification of one
or more result local files on the command-line. This means that if there are,
for instance, results files in a remote GitHub repository a person who wants to
perform the integration step must first clone the GitHub repository and then
type all of the directory names when running the chasten integrate command.

Ultimately, it would be nice if all of the various paths that chasten supports
for input could either be a file name, directory, or remote file name. Which one
of these it actually is should be automatically detected by the tool! This means
that, for instance, the tool should never crash when it accidentally tries to
treat a remote directory like it is a remote directory.

@gkapfham gkapfham added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 22, 2023
@simojo simojo added the on-hold Low priority label Dec 1, 2023
@simojo
Copy link
Collaborator

simojo commented Dec 1, 2023

Putting on hold for the Fall 2023 semester. This is not central to the project, and we already have remote config files, which is arguably the most important.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request on-hold Low priority
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants