Skip to content

Checks and Balances #43

@TanyaS08

Description

@TanyaS08

There are still a few modifications that need to be made to make this project a bit more generalisable. This is two parts: I think we can write a series of tests to prompt users to structure their data correctly and possibly use types/struts to ensure consistency in data structure/naming.

In terms of checks needed:

  • make sure that traits in feeding rules and trait data match up (both in terms of names and number)
  • specify the taxon column name (allows us to more easily subset/differentiate a trait vector/column from the species one)
  • find a way to standardise the feeding rules data frame structure - currently the internal names are very explicit and so we either need a helper function that allows users to turn their data frame into a 'feeding rules df' or find a way to make the function more general...

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

featureNeeded for core functionality

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions