Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

In place hinge #1317

Open
MikiGrit opened this issue Nov 27, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

In place hinge #1317

MikiGrit opened this issue Nov 27, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@MikiGrit
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I would like to be able to create in-place hinge. The obvious use-case is 3D printing.

Describe the solution you'd like
I imagine something like this: https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2187167 I hope it would not be difficult to add new parameter to hinge functions (https://github.com/BelfrySCAD/BOSL2/wiki/hinges.scad) already present in BOSL2 library.

Thanks for consideration.

@revarbat
Copy link
Collaborator

Wouldn't knuckle_hinge() ( https://github.com/BelfrySCAD/BOSL2/wiki/hinges.scad#module-knuckle_hinge ) cover this?

@MikiGrit
Copy link
Author

Maybe I'm missing something but I did not find the way how to fill the inner hole with rod that would attach to one side. Kind of what you can see in this image:
28e2fbb650d12e08818b91cfd91193ce_display_large

And yes, I hoped that it could be simple addition of new parameter to the knuckle_hinge function whether it should be created with inner filled or not.

Note that both sides should be printed at once. That's why I called it in place printed hinge.

@adrianVmariano
Copy link
Collaborator

There's no support for that in the existing library. But I wonder, will this reliably print? You're relying on bridging to accurately build that rod. Does that work? The way I've seen in-place hinges done is with cones that nest along the hinge so the angles are always >45, but that would require more than the simple addition of a component to the existing model.

@MikiGrit
Copy link
Author

From my experience, you have to use a little force to get it moving. But after that, it is fine.

And you are right. Hinge with cone would be even better. I just also thought that the cone would be more difficult, so I suggested the rod.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants