You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Firstly, thank you so much for this underrated tool.
I think there should be a distinction between an article's own tone of storytelling, and a quote containing sensational words being mentioned; correctly attributed quotes should be exempted from the evaluation because it affects the author's bias when it is factual reporting.
Thank you again and keep up the great work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for your positive feedback! You're right; this version is a basic demo. We're developing future versions to clearly distinguish between quotes and the author's text. Thank you again for taking the time to write your suggestion 😊
Firstly, thank you so much for this underrated tool.
I think there should be a distinction between an article's own tone of storytelling, and a quote containing sensational words being mentioned; correctly attributed quotes should be exempted from the evaluation because it affects the author's bias when it is factual reporting.
Thank you again and keep up the great work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: