Add field to indicate silica-preserved tissue sample taken? #314
Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
Thanks for your thoughts, @jkleinkopf ! I wonder if this is what you're looking for: if you do a search through the public interface, you can narrow your search to specimens that have genetic data in the Linked Resources tab |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi @jkleinkopf and @themerekat FYI - The NEON Biorepository data portal deals with this in a couple of different ways. One is to have a separate collection for the tissue or DNA samples and the vouchers and use the associatedOccurrences field to link them. Eg. sometimes there are associatedOccurrences in https://biorepo.neonscience.org/portal/collections/misc/collprofiles.php?collid=28 and https://biorepo.neonscience.org/portal/collections/misc/collprofiles.php?collid=25. This is not exaclty the same as what you are asking but it does allow users to get the same info and means that all tissue samples are searchable. Another thing we do is to use the material samples module / extension to create records for tissues, organs, etc. associated with vouchers that we prepare. This provides users with an indexed list of the available tissue samples associated with the voucher. Material samples are not yet searchable but that is something that is already on the radar for future development. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi, I am currently processing a number of collections I made recently, and I noticed there isn't a field available to indicate that I have taken tissue samples of these specimens. I have seen that there is a "Linked Resources" section and an area for linking genetic resources in GenBank, but it would be awesome to have a field (or checkbox) to indicate that tissue samples are available for genetic sequencing.
I'm currently attempting to make coin-envelope-sized specimen labels for tissue samples, but it appears the only way to do this would be via a mail-merge in excel. Right now, I am downloading specimen metadata for each specimen with a tissue sample individually before starting the mail merge. It would be much more efficient to be able to filter by all specimens by tissue availability first!
Thanks,
Joseph
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions