Replies: 1 comment
-
To help people better understand what I'm proposing, here is a possible structure (in plain English) below. This is analogous to the existing symbiota table, omoccurassociations, and both are in the dwc ResourceRelationship class, https://dwc.tdwg.org/terms/#resourcerelationship. Table: taxaassociations Unique key on: tid, tidAssociate, relationship, The field, relationshipType, would be a foreign key on the following table: Links to supporting occurrences could be a separate table. Relationship references could also be a separate table. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
We'd like to include information on our taxon profile pages about relationships with other taxa that are not taxonomic relationships, such as host/parasite, pollinator/plant, larval host plant/insect, predator/prey, commonly associated taxa, look-alike taxa, and so on. This would require at least one table to capture the data. It could be structured similarly to omoccurassociations. At a minimum, the fields needed would be: two taxon identifier fields, two more fields that identify their roles in the relationship, maybe another for the category of relationship, as well as a text field for public display that describes or qualifies the relationship. Links to supporting occurrences or references, and maybe internal comments could also be useful. Is this of interest to other portals?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions