Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using normalised vs normalised values #102

Closed
Shubhra1994 opened this issue Jul 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Using normalised vs normalised values #102

Shubhra1994 opened this issue Jul 22, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Shubhra1994
Copy link

Hello,
Great package, thank you.
I have a doubt about using the normalization function within the escape.matrix function v/s using the performNormalization function by itself.
If I am correct, the performNormalization() is set to false by default and the tutorial does not set it otherwise and the downstream analysis, the visualisations are done on the non normalised slots as well.

What do you recommend:
-running the escape.matrix() followed by performNormalization() and viz. on non-normalised slot.
-running the escape.matrix() with normalisation set to true followed by viz. on non-normalised slot.

Best

@ncborcherding
Copy link
Member

@Shubhra1994

Thanks for reaching out - you are correct, the vignette and escape.matrix() do not use normalization as a default. This was due to the consideration for computational efficiency (the default normalization can take a lot of time) and I wanted to allow users to have the option to incorporate other normalizations if they choose.

If you are looking to normalize your data, I would compare the non-normalized values and the normalized values. The assumption in normalization is that the level of counts per cell influence the enrichment value. You can visualize either normalized for non-normalized values, I visualized non-normalized in the vignette for the above reasons.

Nick

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants