Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
98 lines (80 loc) · 8.22 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

98 lines (80 loc) · 8.22 KB
Raw

Dual Threshold Optimzation (DTO)

Dual Threshold Optimization (DTO) is a method that sets the thresholds for TF binding and TF-perturbation response by considering both data sets together. DTO chooses, for each TF, the pair of (binding, response) thresholds that minimizes the probability that the overlap between the bound and responsive sets results from random gene selection.

In addition to identifying convergence of binding and response, this tool may also be extended for analyzing any pair of datasets, in which the data entries can be ranked. For example, you may identify the convergence of two RNA-seq replicates.

Requirement and Setup

1. Virtual environment

Create a conda virtual env (miniconda or anaconda) and install modules.

conda create -n dto python=3.6
conda activate dto
conda install scipy numpy pandas 
conda install -c conda-forge multiprocess

2. [Optional] Job queuing system

Job queuing system SLURM is preferred to enable high-throughput computing. SLURM version tested:

slurm-wlm 17.11.7

Input Data

1. Transcriptional responses to TF perturbation

A data matrix of the levels of transcriptional responses to TF perturbations, where columns represent the individual perturbed TFs and rows represent the genes. Each column is expected to be the output of differential expression analysis that compares the expression profiles of TF perturbation and pre-preturbation samples. The entry can either be represented as log fold-change or P-value. The file should be in CSV format with TFs as column names in the first row and genes as row names in the first column.

2. TF binding strengths

A data matrix of the binding strengths, where columns represent the individual assayed TFs and rows represent the genes. Each entry can be represented as occupancy level or statistical significance of the TF binding events occur on the gene's regulatory region (promoters and/or enhancers). For the gene that have multiple peaks at its regulatory region, you may use the sum or max of the binding strengths of those peaks. The file should be in CSV format with TFs as column names in the first row and genes as row names in the first column.

Note

  • Make sure that the column names of the two datasets have the same naming scheme to allow proper pairing of the samples. For example, use systematic name for all (such as ENSG00000256223) or use common name (ZNF10).
  • Similarily make sure the row names are consistent for proper mateching of the gene sets.

Code Usage

1. Run DTO on authentic datasets

python thresholdSearch.py -d <response_csv> --DE_decreasing <True/False> -b <binding_csv> --Bin_decreasing <True/False> --sbatch_loc <output_dir>/authentic_model/ --genes_universe <gene_universe_file> [--geneNames_file <gene_name_file>] [--run_local]

Required arguments:

  • -d <response_csv> CSV file of transcriptional response levels of TF-perturbation. The response levels are based on differential expression or DE analysis on TF-perturbed expression profile vs. pre-perturbation profile. Those levels can be represented as absolute of log fold-changes (LFCs) or P-values.
  • -b <binding_csv> CSV file of TF binding strengths. The binding strengths can be represented as occupancy levels of the peaks (e.g. heights of ChIP peaks) or statistical significances (e.g. P-values).
  • --DE_decreasing <True/False> Use True if the response levels should be raneked in descending order. Use False if ranked in ascending order. For example: If using LFCs, set True as higher absolute LFC represents stronger response. If using P-values, set False as lower P-value represents stronger response.
  • --Bin_decreasing <True/False> Use True if the binding strengths should be ranked in descending order. Use False if ranked in ascending order. For example: If using occupancy levels, set True as higher occupancy level represents stronger TF binding. If using P-values, set False as lower P-value represents stronger TF binding.
  • --sbatch_loc <output_dir>/authentic_model/ Directory for output data.
  • --genes_universe <gene_universe_file> Gene universe list file, which contains all possible genes to be considered as the universe for calculating overlap statistics.

Optional arguments:

  • --geneNames_file <gene_name_file> CSV file of gene name conversion, if the systematic gene names in the data files are preferred to be converted into common gene names.
  • --run_local If no SLURM is available, set this flag to run DTO in serial fashion on your local machine.

2. Run DTO on randomized datasets

python thresholdSearch.py --random True -d <response_csv> --DE_decreasing <True/False> -b <binding_csv> --Bin_decreasing <True/False> --sbatch_loc <output_dir>/random_models/ --genes_universe <gene_universe_file> [--geneNames_file <gene_name_file>] [--run_local]

Required arguments:

  • Same as above, except:
  • --random True Use True for running DTO on randomized input data 1000 times. The DTO results on randomized data is used to create an empirical null distribution.
  • --sbatch_loc <output_dir>/random_models/ Make a new output directory for null model output.

3. Summarize DTO results

python summarizeFinalResults.py -i <output_dir> [--run local]

Required arguments:

  • -i <output_dir> Directory of DTO results including both authentic model and randomized models.

Optional arguments:

  • --run_local If no SLURM is available, set this flag to run DTO in serial fashion on your local machine.

Example Usage

A small yeast dataset of TF perturbation responses (ZEV 15-min) and TF binding locations (transposon calling cards) is provided in Examples/. The response values are the absolute log fold-changes and the binding strength values are -log10(P-value). We set --DE_decreasing and --Bin_decreasing to True. It means that the genes should be ranked in decreasing order of their responsive levels (the higher rank, the stronger response), and likewise for the binding data.

First, run the authentic model.

python thresholdSearch.py -d ../Examples/ZEV15_response_data.csv --DE_decreasing True -b ../Examples/CallingCards_binding_data.csv --Bin_decreasing True --sbatch_loc ../Output/authentic_model/ --genes_universe ../Examples/CallingCards_ZEV15_gene_universe.txt --geneNames_file ../Examples/Yeast_gene_name_lookup.csv

Second, run the randomization trials.

python thresholdSearch.py --random True -d ../Examples/ZEV15_response_data.csv --DE_decreasing True -b ../Examples/CallingCards_binding_data.csv --Bin_decreasing True --sbatch_loc ../Output/random_models/ --genes_universe ../Examples/CallingCards_ZEV15_gene_universe.txt --geneNames_file ../Examples/Yeast_gene_name_lookup.csv

Lastly, summarize DTO results from the above output.

python summarizeFinalResults.py -i ../Output/

Output Files

After completing the above three steps, the DTO results are stored in a directory called <output_dir>/summary/. The following output files are of interest:

  • summary.txt: Basic information of the DTO run: the numbers of TFs that have acceptable convergence, the corresponding TF-target edges and unique target genes.
  • edges.csv: An adjacency list of the high-confidence edges. Each row is a tuple (TF, gene) representing the edge.
  • acceptableTFs.csv: Detailed information of the DTO run for the TFs that have acceptable convergence. Each row shows the DTO results for each TF, including the Venn diagram of the TFs' target sets, FDR lower bound estimate at sensitivity of 80%, overlap statistics such as hypergeometric P-value, and a list of bound and responsive target genes.
  • TFcutoffs.csv: Hypergeometric P-value cutoff for each TF, which is the 1st percentile of the distribution of the empirical hypergeometric P-values obtained from 1000 randomization trials.

In addition, you may reference this file if you are interested in all TFs being analyzed:

  • <output_dir>/authentic_model.csv Same format as acceptableTFs.csv.

References

  • Kang, Y., Patel, N., Shively, C., et al. (2020). Dual threshold optimization and network inference reveal convergent evidence from TF binding locations and TF perturbation responses. Genome Research. doi: 10.1101/gr.259655.119.