A switch
statement can replace multiple if
checks.
It gives a more descriptive way to compare a value with multiple variants.
The switch
has one or more case
blocks and an optional default.
It looks like this:
switch(x) {
case 'value1': // if (x === 'value1')
...
[break]
case 'value2': // if (x === 'value2')
...
[break]
default:
...
[break]
}
The value of x
is checked for a strict equality to the value from the first case
(that is, value1
) then to the second (value2
) and so on.
If the equality is found, switch
starts to execute the code starting from the corresponding case
, until the nearest break
(or until the end of switch
).
If no case is matched then the default
code is executed (if it exists).
An example of switch
(the executed code is highlighted):
let a = 2 + 2;
switch (a) {
case 3:
alert( 'Too small' );
break;
case 4:
alert( 'Exactly!' );
break;
case 5:
alert( 'Too large' );
break;
default:
alert( "I don't know such values" );
}
Here the switch
starts to compare a from the first case
variant that is 3
. The match fails.
Then 4
. That’s a match, so the execution starts from case 4
until the nearest break
.
If there is no break
then the execution continues with the next case without any checks.
An example without break
:
let a = 2 + 2;
switch (a) {
case 3:
alert( 'Too small' );
case 4:
alert( 'Exactly!' );
case 5:
alert( 'Too big' );
default:
alert( "I don't know such values" );
}
In the example above we’ll see sequential execution of three alerts
:
alert( 'Exactly!' );
alert( 'Too big' );
alert( "I don't know such values" );
Both switch
and case
allow arbitrary expressions.
For example:
let a = "1";
let b = 0;
switch (+a) {
case b + 1:
alert("this runs, because +a is 1, exactly equals b+1");
break;
default:
alert("this doesn't run");
}
Here +a
gives 1
, that’s compared with b + 1
in case
, and the corresponding code is executed.
Several variants of case
which share the same code can be grouped.
For example, if we want the same code to run for case 3
and case 5
:
let a = 2 + 2;
switch (a) {
case 4:
alert('Right!');
break;
case 3: // (*) grouped two cases
case 5:
alert('Wrong!');
alert("Why don't you take a math class?");
break;
default:
alert('The result is strange. Really.');
}
Now both 3
and 5
show the same message.
The ability to “group” cases is a side-effect of how switch/case
works without break
. Here the execution of case 3
starts from the line (*)
and goes through case 5
, because there’s no break
.
Let’s emphasize that the equality check is always strict. The values must be of the same type to match.
For example, let’s consider the code:
let arg = prompt("Enter a value?")
switch (arg) {
case '0':
case '1':
alert( 'One or zero' );
break;
case '2':
alert( 'Two' );
break;
case 3:
alert( 'Never executes!' );
break;
default:
alert( 'An unknown value' )
}
-
For
0
,1
, the firstalert
runs. -
For
2
the secondalert
runs. -
But for
3
, the result of theprompt
is a string"3"
, which is not strictly equal===
to the number3
. So we’ve got a dead code incase 3
! Thedefault
variant will execute.