Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Historical system-wide perspective #5

Open
patwater opened this issue Jun 15, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

Historical system-wide perspective #5

patwater opened this issue Jun 15, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@patwater
Copy link

A summary chart similar to the following chart from the Economist would be very helpful in contextualizing the reservoir supply picture. One can imagine clicking on a reservoir in the map to see that band highlighted in this chart and vice versa:

unnamed 1

CC @christophertull @dmarulli @vr00n @datwater

@vr00n
Copy link
Member

vr00n commented Jul 4, 2017

Option to Tableau towards this end if the data is clean and if useful.

@patwater
Copy link
Author

Great idea. Another vector would be to add a simple historical average dashed line to provide context on the Reservoir Explorer dashboard similar to this: https://cdec.water.ca.gov/cgi-progs/products/rescond.pdf

@patwater
Copy link
Author

@mike-amodeo I agree with your idea that the historical average should be over the save time period as selected. So if November 5th is selected, the visualization would show the reservoir levels for that day in the year selected and then the historical average on November 5th. Similar logic for a date range say November 5th to December 5th.

CC @dmarulli

@mike-amodeo
Copy link
Collaborator

most recent commit has added the daily historical average to the line graph as a second line based on @dmarulli 's query. Some label placement still needs to be updated for clarity. Vertical bars on graph show each calendar year.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants