You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Somewhere in the code, that I could not identify where, there is an argument that skips a measurement for a landmark if this landmark is missing for a case/patient in a folder of patients' landmark lists. The issue is for computing Angle between 2 lines that include a midpoint of that missing landmark when the T1/T2 box is checked : the computation of the measurements with the midpoint fail for all cases if a single case does not have the landmark. We get the following keyerror : please see screenshot.
The users are going around this bug by computing Angle between 2 lines that include a midpoint of that missing landmark only at T, and then computing it again at T2, and in this case of computing it for a single time point , the code knows to skip the case that does not have the landmark.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
HUTIN1
changed the title
Error Angle between 2 lines that include a midpoint of that missing landmark when the T1/T2 box is checked
Error Computing Angle between 2 lines that include a midpoint of that missing landmark when the T1/T2 box is checked
Aug 5, 2022
Somewhere in the code, that I could not identify where, there is an argument that skips a measurement for a landmark if this landmark is missing for a case/patient in a folder of patients' landmark lists. The issue is for computing Angle between 2 lines that include a midpoint of that missing landmark when the T1/T2 box is checked : the computation of the measurements with the midpoint fail for all cases if a single case does not have the landmark. We get the following keyerror : please see screenshot.
The users are going around this bug by computing Angle between 2 lines that include a midpoint of that missing landmark only at T, and then computing it again at T2, and in this case of computing it for a single time point , the code knows to skip the case that does not have the landmark.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: