Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

We need a workflow for attaching CantusUltimus links to records #1072

Closed
jacobdgm opened this issue Sep 22, 2023 · 7 comments · Fixed by #1073
Closed

We need a workflow for attaching CantusUltimus links to records #1072

jacobdgm opened this issue Sep 22, 2023 · 7 comments · Fixed by #1073
Assignees
Labels
priority: medium simple fix Should be straightforward to implement

Comments

@jacobdgm
Copy link
Contributor

a subset of #940, and a slightly simpler problem, because we know that URLs on CantusUltimus correspond to URLs on CantusDB in a consistent way.

This can probably be put together as a management command - whenever a manuscript is "published" on CU, we can run this command on the corresponding source in CantusDB and it will update the image links for all the chants in the source.

I'll get to work on this presently - should not be very difficult.

@ahankinson
Copy link
Member

Shouldn't the images for GB-Ob Can Lit 202 be linked to the holding institution, rather that CU?

@jacobdgm
Copy link
Contributor Author

jacobdgm commented Sep 26, 2023

Shouldn't the images for GB-Ob Can Lit 202 be linked to the holding institution, rather that CU?

My understanding is that, whenever we have a published version of the MS up on CU, we should link there. Perhaps @fujinaga can comment further?

@dchiller - looking at a few pages on CU, I don't see a link to the holding institution for the images anywhere. Does this exist? If not, it would probably be a good thing to add - this way people could go from CantusDB to CU for a feature-rich view of the folio, and then go directly to wherever the images are hosted in case they want to download them or something.

@dchiller
Copy link
Contributor

My understanding is that, whenever we have a published version of the MS up on CU, we should link there. Perhaps @fujinaga can comment further?

This is also my understanding based on @fujinaga 's comment here: #940 (comment)

Does this exist?

Not in a public-facing way.

then go directly to wherever the images are hosted in case they want to download them or something.

They can download directly from Cantus Ultimus. We should have an image credit system. But a link...to where? Maybe the example I know best just happens to be the most complicated one, but take Salzinnes: should it link to IDEM/the Alamire Foundation (they host the images)? Should it link to St Mary's University? Your comment suggests this is image-focused, yeah?

@annamorphism
Copy link

They can download directly from Cantus Ultimus. We should have an image credit system. But a link...to where? Maybe the example I know best just happens to be the most complicated one, but take Salzinnes: should it link to IDEM/the Alamire Foundation (they host the images)? Should it link to St Mary's University? Your comment suggests this is image-focused, yeah?

Salzinnes is indeed a complicated case, and has also linked to CU within Cantus for a long time (always??). But for, say, the Hartker antiphoner, CantusDB has long pointed people to e-codices, and I can imagine people wanting/expecting to be directed there (where it is also easier to find other books from St-Gall or whatever). I actually think this is not a CU problem but rather that CantusDB should provide both a link to the holding library (maybe in the source description?) and to the richer features on CU, but that would be something to discuss with Debra (off-the-cuff on my part!).

@dchiller
Copy link
Contributor

But for, say, the Hartker antiphoner, CantusDB has long pointed people to e-codices, and I can imagine people wanting/expecting to be directed there (where it is also easier to find other books from St-Gall or whatever).

Yeah, this makes sense.

I actually think this is not a CU problem but rather that CantusDB should provide both a link to the holding library (maybe in the source description?) and to the richer features on CU, but that would be something to discuss with Debra (off-the-cuff on my part!).

This is definitely an interesting idea...makes a lot of sense.

@ahankinson
Copy link
Member

ahankinson commented Sep 26, 2023

The IIIF manifests usually have a requiredStatement that are required, by the spec, to be shown by viewers. This usually specifies the institution that provides the images.

There is also a provider section that can give more information about the source of the manifest.

https://iiif.io/api/presentation/3.0/#requiredstatement

IIIF v2 had attribution and logo sections.

@dchiller
Copy link
Contributor

Wow...thank you! I didn't realize Cantus Ultimus was not up to standard in this way. Made an issue at DDMAL/cantus#786.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority: medium simple fix Should be straightforward to implement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants