Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

There is a significant gap compared to the reported ACC of GCN on CiteSeer #2

Open
TracReggie opened this issue Nov 28, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@TracReggie
Copy link

I found that some data processing was done during testing on Citeseer, so I tested the performance of GCN on the processed data and obtained an ACC of 84.86 ± 0.14, which is significantly different from the results reported in the article. GCN is set to two layers, with an hidden dim is 512.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant