Is it possible to use GLX/WGL without the rest of OpenGL headers? #398
MarkLagodych
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Yeah you can use it without but you'll have to replace the include (manually) with something that provides the symbols instead or define it yourself. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I am working on a hobby window management library (like SDL but focused on GUI) and I wish to add functionality for creating OpenGL contexts, without actual OpenGL loading. The reason is that I want to use GLX/WGL/EGL for creating GL contexts and let the users use whatever OpenGL loader, version and extensions they want.
However, the generated
<glad/glx.h>
header includes<glad/gl.h>
which does not seem to do much: it only provides one typeGLubyte
for a single function definition.The generated
<glad/wgl.h>
also includes<glad/gl.h>
but I did not find what definitions from there are used.The question is: is it possible to use WGL/GLX without
<glad/gl.h>
?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions