You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: documentation/LoggerDesignAndTesting.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -22,6 +22,6 @@ The general workflow is:
22
22
23
23
Logger.info/warn/etc(message) -> forwards to LogBridgelog(logger, esapiLevel, type, message) -> forwards to LogHandler.log(...) -> forwards to slf4j Logger implementation with appropriate level and composed message.
24
24
25
-
So each of the tests for each of the classes verifies data in -> data out based on the Logging API. The structure for JUL, Log4J, and SLF4J are almost identical. There are a few differences in the interaction with the underlying Logger interactions and expectations. As a result, the tests are also almost full duplications (again accounting for differences in the underlying logging API).
25
+
So each of the tests for each of the classes verifies data in -> data out based on the Logging API. The structure for JUL and SLF4J are almost identical. There are a few differences in the interaction with the underlying Logger interactions and expectations. As a result, the tests are also almost full duplications (again accounting for differences in the underlying logging API).
0 commit comments