The performance of Ablation Studies

[3bobo]

Thanks for your work. I notice that the L2 APH performance of Table IV (70.83/73.62/76.80/73.75) is different from the performance of Table II (72.0/74.7/76.9/74.5) in the paper, could you explain this difference?

[Eaphan]

As we described in the manuscript, "the results of our method in Table II use 2x wider ResNet and contrastive denoising training [19]." And we used the normal ResNet backbone in the ablation study.