Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About the ver #62

Open
zxp19821005 opened this issue Sep 11, 2023 · 8 comments
Open

About the ver #62

zxp19821005 opened this issue Sep 11, 2023 · 8 comments

Comments

@zxp19821005
Copy link

Will you please add the correctlly version of the package?
It's always 'latest' now.
I've ported the package to AUR edgetx-buddy-bin , but the version was always '0.1.0'.

@Pancronos
Copy link
Contributor

Agree. I think that requires some changes, for example in translation is a fixed word "(Latest)": " but of course is very helpful to have a version number, users think to have the latest version and it well could be that is not.

@pfeerick
Copy link
Member

pfeerick commented Sep 21, 2023

That would require a tagged/versioned release, however, there hasn't been one, hence why it is always latest. i.e. it's a discrepancy between it being a tagged release, and the version that was manually set in https://github.com/EdgeTX/buddy/blob/main/package.json

@raphaelcoeffic
Copy link
Member

@pfeerick should we start incrementing the release numbers and have some proper "releases"? It would probably make sense for downstream packaging.

@pfeerick
Copy link
Member

No complaints from the peanut gallery... especially if it makes the lives of potential contributors or other package maintainers better 🤭

@freshollie
Copy link
Collaborator

freshollie commented Oct 24, 2023

I'm happy to implement automated versioning. I've done this before using semantic-release which will auto increment the version number on merge to main depending on the conventional commitments which were merged to main

I've put this off because originally the project was considered a prototype and didn't want to spend time thinking about versioning

@raphaelcoeffic
Copy link
Member

I'm happy to implement automated versioning.

Sounds great :-) Let do it!

@HThuren
Copy link
Contributor

HThuren commented Apr 7, 2024

Where did this end ?

@raphaelcoeffic
Copy link
Member

Where did this end ?

Nowhere for now 😅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants