You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 28, 2024. It is now read-only.
Row 21, Jill F. specifically for changing renderer types and dictionary standard is lost, so symbols default 2525-D and symbols go to unknown/?
I am guessing they are looking for better field intuition as to which might be SIDC compliant and guess at which Standard the values might match... e.g. review field names/aliases for key works like "sidc", "2525", "SIC", etc. and then review the first X valid values in these rows to figure if 2525C vs 2525D, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Found at Holistic Testing on 8/9/2019:
onenote:///\tahoe\holistic\ArcGISProfessional\Srinivas\Pro_v2_5\ProInternalHolistic_v2_5\August2019\Friday_08_09_2019.one#Pro%20for%20Intel§ion-id={F5163543-00ED-4E04-962A-EF349811C6D0}&page-id={495373F4-9079-4A22-A025-E02A20F312F4}&end
Row 21, Jill F. specifically for changing renderer types and dictionary standard is lost, so symbols default 2525-D and symbols go to unknown/?
I am guessing they are looking for better field intuition as to which might be SIDC compliant and guess at which Standard the values might match... e.g. review field names/aliases for key works like "sidc", "2525", "SIC", etc. and then review the first X valid values in these rows to figure if 2525C vs 2525D, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: