AoC2025 does not cover all possible cases(day 09)

[serg-bloim]

First of all thanks. I used your solution to troubleshoot mine. And while doing so I found that your solution for part2 challenge(python one) does not cover some specific cases. Feel free to ignore. But in case you were interested I just wanted to leave you an example.

A slightly altered testing example from the problem description:

7,1
11,1
11,7
9,7
9,5
2,5
2,3
7,3
7,2
3,2
3,1

Should return 35

[Siliconrob]

Thanks, I will take a look at it this weekend. I am real tired right now.

[Fadi88]

Thanks for pointing that out, I do appreciate it and did have a look

this solution assume that 2 opposite corners are already in the provided edges, which happens to be the case for the input (but not the test case)

One possible solution is to extend the edges by all intermediate points, which will make the solution more generic but will explode the performance.

So in short, you can assume it is "hardcoded" for the kind of input for the problem today that even the provided example might fail

[Siliconrob]

@Fadi88 Is real smart 🧠