Replies: 7 comments 3 replies
-
I guess one can regex replace |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Not at all - as I mentioned, it can be changed with a regex replace rather easily, I'm just not sure what are the benefits: I agree that ISO 8601 is superior to both m-d-y and d-m-y in general, but these dates are purely informational, we don't use them for anything else. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Just for the record, the regex should be |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It didn't cover some lines, so it won't be that easy.
I've just wanted to give food for thought to dev team, nothing more. If to follow ISO 8601 notations you'll get no benefits rather than more logical date format. For example, both of these lines take same amount of disk space:
That's it. Hopefully at some day entire humanity will use ISO 8601 date format. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I've noticed that skipik doesn't seem to abide new date and time format. Over time it'll cause a minor inconsistency.
Just tell all the contributors to update their ChangelogHeader.lua and ChangelogCheckEnglish.lua macros to avoid such cases in future. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks to all contributors that made this change possible! Here is nothing to discuss on that topic anymore, so discussion is closed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
What about to convert changelog dates to ISO 8601 format and how time-consuming it will be? Considering that you already have 1365 builds in github repo it probably don't worth it.
Here is example of what I'd want to see:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions