This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 18, 2023. It is now read-only.
Unexpected behavior when using AAL.get_summary() with extra parameters #70
Labels
question
Further information is requested
Hi,
I am having trouble understanding differences in the behavior of the aal API depending on whether specific depths parameters are provided.
For instance, without any depth parameter the following call returns an average annual loss of $59,207 for the mid scenario in 2020
However, when manually providing the 3 default depth values the mid aal value changes to $80,647 (although the damages associated with each depth level are consistent with the previous call)
In fact, providing any positive value of the depth parameter yields aal values of 80,647. See example below with a depth of 1:
This could still make sense if i) the property 110200183 is below sea-level, ii) the total value of the structure is $80,647, iii) and if the aal mid value actually reports the total damage estimate without probability weighting when the depth is provided. However using location.get_detail I find that the elevation for this property is a high 699. Is there something I am missing?
Thanks a lot for this fantastic API,
Jo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: