From bea206dcad9a0e77601020db359c7e030c1889e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rob Marcer <92092324+robmarcer@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 10:31:06 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Adds a missing word

---
 src/blog/2023/08/open-source-is-a-tier-not-competition.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/blog/2023/08/open-source-is-a-tier-not-competition.md b/src/blog/2023/08/open-source-is-a-tier-not-competition.md
index 05e5ec95b4..0accd846f6 100644
--- a/src/blog/2023/08/open-source-is-a-tier-not-competition.md
+++ b/src/blog/2023/08/open-source-is-a-tier-not-competition.md
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ tags:
 
 More than once we’ve been in discussion with prospective customers on what tier
 is the right tier for their current Node-RED adoption. The question is likely to
-come up "Why wouldn't we just the open source version of FlowFuse?". The
+come up "Why wouldn't we just use the open source version of FlowFuse?". The
 implicit discussion created is one that is alike the question:
 “Why wouldn’t we go with your competition?”. For FlowFuse, and most other open-core
 companies like us, the open licensed and free to use core is tier, not competition.