From d47a33a8a155a784dd87aad2e18ea635c2c57fe8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthew Andres Moreno Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 19:24:16 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Add missing space --- paper/paper.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/paper/paper.md b/paper/paper.md index 816ec83..369c3a5 100644 --- a/paper/paper.md +++ b/paper/paper.md @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ A concise comparison between `pyrimidine` and several popular frameworks is prov : Comparison of the popular genetic algorithm frameworks. \label{frameworks} -`Tpot`/`gama`[@olson; @pieter], `gplearn`/`pysr`, and `scikit-opt` follow the scikit-learn style [@sklearn_api], providing fixed APIs with limited extensibility. They are merely serving their respective fields effectively (as well as `NEAT`[@neat-python]). +`Tpot`/`gama` [@olson; @pieter], `gplearn`/`pysr`, and `scikit-opt` follow the scikit-learn style [@sklearn_api], providing fixed APIs with limited extensibility. They are merely serving their respective fields effectively (as well as `NEAT`[@neat-python]). `DEAP` is feature-rich and mature. However, it primarily adopts a tedious meta-programming style. Some parts of the source code lack sufficient decoupling, limiting its extensibility. `Gaft` is a highly object-oriented software with excellent scalability, but it is currently inactive.