link fix (#956)

Author: KMSOC

_pages/manage/annual-assessment/2024-report/2024-observations-acknowledgements.md

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Data validation findings continue to support the misinterpretation or misunderst
 
 * Validation 7.2 revealed in 48 failures where reporting entities indicated in Q55 that they use specific methods---options b), c), d), or e)---for testing electronic document conformance but did not select option d) in Q9, which indicates the use of a test process for electronic documents. To test electronic documents effectively, they also perform evaluations using a documented test process. The lack of alignment between Q55 and Q9 suggests a possible oversight or gap in the reporting entities' testing procedures.
 
-Other data validation flags, such as contradictory responses or responses that exceed or do not total when required 100%, are denoted in <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NlGDu3MYol18ozd3BACYewi3f_bns2RLXYzF7OSp5NE/edit?usp=sharing" target="_blank" class="usa-link--external">Data Validation for FY24 Governmentwide Annual Assessment</a>.
+Other data validation flags, such as contradictory responses or responses that exceed or do not total when required 100%, are denoted in <a href="https://assets.section508.gov/files/reports/cr-2024/Data%20Validation%20for%20FY24%20Governmentwide%20Annual%20Assessment.docx" target="_blank" class="usa-link--external">Data Validation for FY24 Governmentwide Annual Assessment</a>.
 
 As with FY23, no data was excluded from analysis regardless of data validation outcomes for FY24. However, before conducting the 40 validation tests, GSA carried out a preliminary review to identify and address data discrepancies that would skew descriptive statistics related to conformance. This process included direct engagement with reporting entities to correct invalid data, which was undertaken in FY23. Specific discrepancies addressed during this preliminary review included: