FIX: Deverification logic mess on badges and admin actions #4792
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to language files and component logic related to GIVbacks notifications and project verification status. New keys have been added for clarity, existing keys have been reformatted, and properties in components have been modified to reflect GIVback eligibility instead of verification status. These adjustments aim to enhance the consistency and clarity of messaging across multiple languages and components. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/components/VerificationBadge.tsx (1)
14-17: LGTM! Consider simplifying the logic.The updated logic correctly uses
isGivbackEligibleinstead ofisVerified. However, we could simplify this further for better readability:Consider applying this change:
- const verStatus = isGivbackEligible - ? EVerificationStatus.VERIFIED - : verificationStatus !== EVerificationStatus.VERIFIED - ? verificationStatus - : ''; + const verStatus = isGivbackEligible + ? EVerificationStatus.VERIFIED + : verificationStatus || '';This simplification maintains the same logic but reduces nesting and improves clarity.
src/components/views/project/ProjectBadges.tsx (2)
30-35: Approved: Enhanced conditional logic for renderingThe updated conditional check correctly includes
isGivbackEligible, ensuring that GIVback eligible projects are properly displayed. This aligns well with the PR objectives.Consider refactoring the condition for improved readability:
- if ( - !verified && - !isGivbackEligible && - !isQF && - (!campaigns || campaigns.length === 0) - ) { + if (!verified && !isGivbackEligible && !isQF && !campaigns?.length) { return null; }This refactoring simplifies the check for campaigns and makes the condition more concise.
Line range hint
1-138: Summary: Improved logic for project badges, clarification neededThe changes in this file effectively address the PR objectives by refining the logic for project verification and GIVback eligibility. The code is more clear and the conditional rendering has been improved. However, it's crucial to confirm that the new logic for the
verifiedvariable (line 28) aligns with the intended business rules for project verification.Consider adding a comment explaining the business logic behind the
verifiedvariable to improve code maintainability and prevent future confusion.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- lang/ca.json (1 hunks)
- lang/en.json (1 hunks)
- lang/es.json (2 hunks)
- src/components/VerificationBadge.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/views/project/ProjectBadges.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/views/project/ProjectGIVbackToast.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/ProjectStats.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/views/userProfile/projectsTab/ProjectItem.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (22)
src/components/VerificationBadge.tsx (3)
10-13: LGTM! Consistent with interface changes.The parameter destructuring has been correctly updated to use
isGivbackEligibleinstead ofisVerified, maintaining consistency with theIPropsinterface changes.
Line range hint
1-45: Overall, the changes look good and align with the PR objective.The
VerificationBadgecomponent has been successfully updated to useisGivbackEligibleinstead ofisVerified. This change is consistent throughout the component, from theIPropsinterface to the internal logic. The modifications align well with the PR's goal of fixing deverification logic.A few suggestions for improvement:
- Verify that all usages of
VerificationBadgein the codebase have been updated to passisGivbackEligible.- Consider simplifying the
verStatusdetermination logic as suggested earlier.These changes enhance the component's clarity and maintainability while addressing the intended functionality updates.
6-6: LGTM! Verify usage in the codebase.The addition of
isGivbackEligiblealigns with the PR objective. However, ensure that all components usingVerificationBadgehave been updated to passisGivbackEligibleinstead ofisVerified.Run the following script to verify the prop usage:
✅ Verification successful
[/run_scripts]
VerificationBadge prop update confirmed
All instances of
<VerificationBadgenow useisGivbackEligibleinstead ofisVerified.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of VerificationBadge component # Test: Search for VerificationBadge usage. Expect: Only occurrences of isGivbackEligible, no isVerified. rg --type typescript --type tsx -A 5 $'<VerificationBadge'Length of output: 94
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of VerificationBadge component # Test: Search for VerificationBadge usage. Expect: Only occurrences of isGivbackEligible, no isVerified. rg -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -A 5 '<VerificationBadge'Length of output: 1161
src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/ProjectStats.tsx (1)
71-71: LGTM! Consider updating related components and text.The change from
isVerifiedtoisGivbackEligiblealigns well with the PR objective of fixing the deverification logic. This update more accurately represents the project's status in terms of GIVback eligibility.However, to ensure consistency across the application:
- Verify that the
VerificationBadgecomponent has been updated to handle the newisGivbackEligibleprop correctly.- Consider updating the tooltip text (around line 38-40) to reflect the change from verification status to GIVback eligibility.
To help verify the impact of this change across the codebase, I can run the following script:
This script will help identify other areas of the codebase that might need updates to maintain consistency with this change. Would you like me to run this script?
src/components/views/project/ProjectBadges.tsx (2)
20-25: LGTM: Improved clarity in destructuringThe changes in destructuring
projectDataenhance clarity by renamingverifiedtoprojectVerifiedand addingisGivbackEligible. This aligns well with the PR's objective of addressing deverification logic issues.
28-28: Please clarify the business logic for verificationThe new
verifiedvariable combinesprojectVerifiedandisGivbackEligible. Could you please confirm if this change intentionally broadens the criteria for a project to be considered verified? It's important to ensure this aligns with the intended business logic for project verification.lang/en.json (5)
1664-1679: Improved project status and GIVbacks messagesThe new and modified entries provide more detailed and specific messages for various project statuses and GIVbacks scenarios. These changes improve clarity and user communication.
1677-1677: Flexible GIVbacks reward messageThis message uses a placeholder for the percentage value, allowing for dynamic content. This approach is flexible and consistent with best practices for internationalization.
1678-1679: Clear messages with dynamic content for project statusThese messages effectively communicate project vouching status and GIVbacks eligibility. The use of placeholders for dynamic values (e.g.,
{percent},${value}) allows for flexible and personalized content.
Line range hint
1680-1743: Comprehensive additions for tooltips and project categoriesThe new entries at the end of the file provide clear and concise explanations for various features, including stream balance, matching donations, and project verification. These additions will improve user understanding and enhance the overall user experience.
Line range hint
1-1743: Comprehensive update to English translationsThis update to the English translations file is comprehensive and well-executed. The new entries and modifications provide more detailed and specific information across various features of the application. The consistent style and clear language will enhance user understanding and improve the overall user experience.
Some notable improvements include:
- More detailed project status and GIVbacks eligibility messages
- New tooltips for stream balance and donation matching
- Additional project categories and descriptions
These changes will contribute to a more informative and user-friendly interface.
lang/es.json (4)
1664-1666: Update translations for verified project ownersThe translations for verified project owners have been updated to include more specific information about GIVbacks and project visibility. These changes improve clarity for project owners.
1667-1668: New translation for non-eligible verified projectsA new translation has been added for verified projects that are not eligible for GIVbacks. This provides clear information to users about the project's status and the benefits of boosting with GIVpower.
1677-1680: Updated translations for verified public projectsThe translations for verified public projects have been updated to include more specific information about reward percentages and GIVbacks eligibility. These changes provide clearer information to potential donors.
Line range hint
1-1680: Overall improvements to Spanish translationsThe changes made to this file enhance the Spanish translations by:
- Providing more specific information about GIVbacks and project visibility for verified project owners.
- Adding clear explanations for non-eligible verified projects.
- Updating translations for verified public projects with more detailed information about reward percentages and eligibility.
These improvements will help Spanish-speaking users better understand the GIVbacks system and project statuses on the platform.
lang/ca.json (6)
1664-1665: New translations added for verified project descriptionsThese new translations provide clear descriptions for verified project owners and public viewers. They explain the benefits of boosting projects and how it affects GIVbacks percentages and project visibility.
1666-1667: New translations for non-verified project ownersThese translations encourage project owners to consider if their projects are creating or supporting public goods, and explain the benefits of becoming GIVbacks eligible.
1668-1675: Various project status translations addedNew translations have been added for different project statuses such as cancelled, deactivated, draft, incomplete application, and rejected. These provide clear information to project owners about their project's current state and next steps.
1676-1679: Reward percentage translations updatedThe translations for reward percentages have been updated to include dynamic values. This allows for more flexible and accurate communication of reward percentages to users.
1680-1681: New translations for verified projects not eligible for GIVbacksThese translations explain that while a project has been vouched for and can benefit from GIVpower, donations to it won't generate GIVbacks for donors. This provides important clarity for both project owners and potential donors.
Line range hint
1-1679: Overall translation quality is highThe new translations and updates in this file maintain a consistent style and terminology with the existing content. They provide clear and informative messages for various project statuses, verification states, and GIVbacks eligibility scenarios. The translations effectively communicate important information to both project owners and potential donors in Catalan.
src/components/views/project/ProjectGIVbackToast.tsx (1)
95-123:⚠️ Potential issueUncomment the
valueparameter if required by the message.In the
formatMessagecall on line 103, thevalueparameter is commented out. If the internationalization message${useIntlTitle}verified_public_3requires thevalueparameter, please uncomment it to ensure the message displays correctly. If it's not needed, consider removing the commented line to keep the code clean.Run the following script to verify the parameters required by the message ID
verified_public_3:✅ Verification successful
Unnecessary Parameter Removed
The
valueparameter is not required by theverified_public_3message. Please remove the commented line to maintain clean code.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if 'verified_public_3' message requires the 'value' parameter. # Test: Search for 'verified_public_3' in localization JSON files. # Expect: Output should indicate whether 'value' is used in the message. rg "verified_public_3" --glob "*.json" -A 3Length of output: 1399
| @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ const ProjectItem: FC<IProjectItem> = props => { | |||
| </P> | |||
| <div> | |||
| <VerificationBadge | |||
| isVerified={project?.isGivbackEligible} | |||
| isGivbackEligible={project?.isGivbackEligible} | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Verification of VerificationBadge Prop Update Reveals Issues
The VerificationBadge component does not appear to have been updated to handle the new isGivbackEligible prop. While other components are passing this prop, the VerificationBadge itself may not be correctly receiving or utilizing it.
- VerificationBadge Component:
- Ensure that
VerificationBadgeaccepts and appropriately uses theisGivbackEligibleprop.
- Ensure that
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the impact of changing isVerified to isGivbackEligible
The prop passed to VerificationBadge has been updated from isVerified to isGivbackEligible, which aligns with the PR objective of fixing the deverification logic. This change shifts the focus from general verification to specific GIVback eligibility.
To ensure this change is implemented correctly and consistently:
- Confirm that the
VerificationBadgecomponent has been updated to handle the newisGivbackEligibleprop correctly. - Verify that the
projectobject includes theisGivbackEligibleproperty and that it's being set correctly. - Check other components using
VerificationBadgeto ensure consistent prop usage across the codebase.
Run the following script to verify the changes:
Re-running Verification Scripts with Adjusted Commands
The previous verification attempt failed because the ripgrep tool did not recognize the typescript file type. Adjusting the scripts to target TypeScript files using file extensions instead.
[/run_scripts]
Re-running Verification Scripts with Updated File Patterns
The previous verification did not find any usages of VerificationBadge because .tsx files were not included in the search. Updating the glob pattern to include both .ts and .tsx files to ensure all relevant files are checked.
[/run_scripts]
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the VerificationBadge component and its usage
# Test 1: Check if VerificationBadge component has been updated
echo "Checking VerificationBadge component:"
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'const VerificationBadge = ({ isGivbackEligible, $_* }) => {
$$$
}'
# Test 2: Verify project object includes isGivbackEligible property
echo "Checking project object for isGivbackEligible property:"
rg --type typescript 'interface IProject' -A 20 | rg 'isGivbackEligible'
# Test 3: Check other usages of VerificationBadge
echo "Checking other usages of VerificationBadge:"
rg --type typescript 'VerificationBadge' -A 3 -B 1
Length of output: 605
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the VerificationBadge component and its usage without specifying file types
# Test 1: Check if VerificationBadge component has been updated
echo "Checking VerificationBadge component:"
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'const VerificationBadge = ({ isGivbackEligible, $_* }) => {
$$$
}'
# Test 2: Verify project object includes isGivbackEligible property
echo "Checking project object for isGivbackEligible property:"
rg 'interface IProject' -A 20 | rg 'isGivbackEligible'
# Test 3: Check other usages of VerificationBadge
echo "Checking other usages of VerificationBadge:"
rg 'VerificationBadge' --glob '*.ts' -A 3 -B 1
Length of output: 628
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the VerificationBadge component and its usage, including .tsx files
# Test 1: Check if VerificationBadge component has been updated
echo "Checking VerificationBadge component:"
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'const VerificationBadge = ({ isGivbackEligible, $_* }) => {
$$$
}'
# Test 2: Verify project object includes isGivbackEligible property
echo "Checking project object for isGivbackEligible property:"
rg 'interface IProject' | rg 'isGivbackEligible'
# Test 3: Check other usages of VerificationBadge
echo "Checking other usages of VerificationBadge:"
rg 'VerificationBadge' --glob '*.{ts,tsx}' -A 3 -B 1
Length of output: 2888
| @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ const ProjectGIVbackToast = () => { | |||
| const isGivbackEligible = projectData?.isGivbackEligible; | |||
| const { givbackFactor } = projectData || {}; | |||
| const isOwnerGivbackEligible = isGivbackEligible && isAdmin; | |||
| const isOwnerNotVerified = !isVerified && isAdmin; | |||
| const isOwnerNotVerified = !isGivbackEligible && isAdmin; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider renaming isOwnerNotVerified for clarity.
The variable isOwnerNotVerified is defined as !isGivbackEligible && isAdmin;. Since it reflects the GIVback eligibility status rather than the verification status, consider renaming it to isOwnerNotGivbackEligible or isOwnerGivbackNotEligible for better clarity and to prevent confusion with isVerified.
| if (isPublicGivbackEligible) { | ||
| if (givbackFactor !== 0) { | ||
| title = formatMessage( | ||
| { | ||
| id: `${useIntlTitle}verified_public_3`, | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| percent: givbackFactorPercent, | ||
| // value: GIVBACKS_DONATION_QUALIFICATION_VALUE_USD, | ||
| }, | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| description = formatMessage( | ||
| { | ||
| id: `${useIntlDescription}verified_public`, | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| value: GIVBACKS_DONATION_QUALIFICATION_VALUE_USD, | ||
| }, | ||
| ); | ||
| link = links.GIVPOWER_DOC; | ||
| Button = ( | ||
| <OutlineButton | ||
| onClick={handleBoostClick} | ||
| label='Boost' | ||
| icon={<IconRocketInSpace16 />} | ||
| /> | ||
| ); | ||
| } else if (isOwnerGivbackEligible) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor nested conditionals to improve readability.
The block of code from lines 95 to 123 contains nested conditionals that handle various eligibility states. Consider refactoring to simplify the logic and enhance readability. One approach is to use a mapping of conditions to their corresponding title, description, link, and Button components.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor