Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

version 2.0.0 on terra underestimation in several cells #360

Open
YOU-k opened this issue Feb 18, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

version 2.0.0 on terra underestimation in several cells #360

YOU-k opened this issue Feb 18, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@YOU-k
Copy link

YOU-k commented Feb 18, 2021

Hi there,
I tried version 2.0.0 on Terra (github.com/HumanCellAtlas/skylab:optimus_v2.0.0_terra) with a human cell 10xv3 chemistry dataset.
I used fastq1 and fastq2 and 10xv3 whitelist and reference genome and annotation as input. And at the same time, run this dataset with CellRanger and zUMIs. The final output for the sparse matrix was collected.
However, I found between these workflows, Optimus seems to underestimate a bunch of cells clearly both with their number of detected genes and number of counts.
image
Do you have any idea why this happen? Is it because of the CB detection or aligner (but they all use STAR)?
I noticed you have a version particular designed for 10xv3 datasets. What's the difference between them? Could this difference be the reason for this?
Cheers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant