Align KGCL and taxonomy with prior work

[cmungall]

We do not do a great job of showing how the KGCL data model aligns with prior work

There is a really excellent summary here:

Romana Pernisch, Daniele Dell’Aglio, Abraham Bernstein,
Beware of the hierarchy — An analysis of ontology evolution and the materialisation impact for biomedical ontologies,
Journal of Web Semantics,
Volume 70,
2021,
100658,
ISSN 1570-8268,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2021.100658.

This summarizes earlier work by Noy et al e.g https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michel-Klein/publication/2930642_A_Component-Based_Framework_for_Ontology_Evolution/links/0912f50ba15cd1a7e5000000/A-Component-Based-Framework-for-Ontology-Evolution.pdf as well as COntoDiff

One of the major contributions of Pernisch et al is looking at impact of entailed axioms - currently our focus is on structural diffs but we should include this

There is also a lot of great stuff in this paper with metrics for ontology contributions and usages, cc @matentzn

[nlharris]

Hmm, should we have cited this in the KGCL paper? (If we get asked to make revisions, maybe we could add it then.)