-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Major upgrade to pydantic 2.0 #4481
Open
1 of 3 tasks
Comments
This was referenced Jul 18, 2023
@pcrespov explore the migration path |
This was referenced Jul 27, 2023
This was referenced Jan 15, 2024
This article contains useful tips on how to approach the migration: https://medium.com/codex/migrating-to-pydantic-v2-5a4b864621c3 |
This was
linked to
pull requests
Aug 28, 2024
Closed
This was
unlinked from
pull requests
Aug 29, 2024
Closed
FastAPI doesn't support a mix of pydantic version. The installed one determines the models version and so on. We will proceed updating the libraries/services one by one. 🤞 |
This was referenced Sep 9, 2024
This was
linked to
pull requests
Sep 18, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Planned changes
Major upgrade not out-of-the box and requires some coordination. This upgrade will bring substantial speedup to the code. It would be desirable to measure the improvement. Should we setup some type of benchmark?
Both libraries have been releases so I added a constraint in
requirements/constraints.txt
We should start testing first the upgrade with the
packages
and then when we understand the migration mechanisms we can do the rest of the repository.Tasks
This is a sub issue from ITISFoundation/osparc-issues#675
Sundae
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: