⬆️ WIP: Upgrade libraries (pydantic v2)

[giancarloromeo]

What do these changes do?

Upgrade libraries (inside packages folder) to Pydantic v2.

Note: the models-library has a dedicated PR (see #6333)

Related issue/s

• resolves Major upgrade to pydantic 2.0 #4481

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.59259% with 30 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (pydantic_v2_migration@d2d81c0). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ackages/aws-library/src/aws_library/ec2/_models.py	52.6%	9 Missing ⚠️
...ages/settings-library/src/settings_library/base.py	86.9%	4 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...s/models-library/src/models_library/basic_regex.py	25.0%	3 Missing ⚠️
.../settings-library/src/settings_library/postgres.py	66.6%	2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...settings-library/src/settings_library/utils_cli.py	92.8%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...ls-library/src/models_library/rabbitmq_messages.py	0.0%	1 Missing ⚠️
...integration/src/service_integration/cli/_config.py	66.6%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...egration/src/service_integration/oci_image_spec.py	85.7%	1 Missing ⚠️
...ettings-library/src/settings_library/prometheus.py	0.0%	1 Missing ⚠️
...es/settings-library/src/settings_library/rabbit.py	66.6%	1 Missing ⚠️
... and 2 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@                   Coverage Diff                   @@
##             pydantic_v2_migration   #6366   +/-   ##
=======================================================
  Coverage                         ?   82.4%           
=======================================================
  Files                            ?     389           
  Lines                            ?   13032           
  Branches                         ?    1144           
=======================================================
  Hits                             ?   10739           
  Misses                           ?    2145           
  Partials                         ?     148           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	82.4% <92.5%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...ackages/aws-library/src/aws_library/ec2/_client.py	100.0% <ø> (ø)
packages/aws-library/src/aws_library/s3/_client.py	95.3% <100.0%> (ø)
...kages/aws-library/src/aws_library/s3/_constants.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
packages/aws-library/src/aws_library/s3/_errors.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
packages/aws-library/src/aws_library/s3/_utils.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...ackages/aws-library/src/aws_library/ssm/_client.py	97.7% <100.0%> (ø)
...ackages/aws-library/src/aws_library/ssm/_errors.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...dask_task_models_library/container_tasks/docker.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...dask_task_models_library/container_tasks/errors.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...dask_task_models_library/container_tasks/events.py	91.8% <100.0%> (ø)
... and 64 more

[giancarloromeo]

In Pydantic v2, it is possible to annotate @computed_field. It must be specified in advance if we want to include it in the model serialization. By default @computed_field(repr=True) for public fields, @computed_field(repr=False) for private ones.

See: https://docs.pydantic.dev/2.0/usage/computed_fields/

[giancarloromeo]

In Pydantic v2, it is possible to annotate @computed_field. It must be specified in advance if we want to include it in the model serialization. By default @computed_field(repr=True) for public fields, @computed_field(repr=False) for private ones.

See: https://docs.pydantic.dev/2.0/usage/computed_fields/

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
6 Security Hotspots

See analysis details on SonarCloud