Should we upstream these type classes?

[locallycompact]

We have been using a type-class based wrapper around cardano-api to deal with era witnesses. The classes we have are similar to IsShelleyBasedEra from this repository and have consistent naming with it, and can be found here:

https://github.com/input-output-hk/hydra/tree/master/cardano-api-classy/src/Cardano/Api/Class

Wondering whether these are worth upstreaming here, as this library has a minimal footprint.

[smelc]

This is one for the grand masters of this repo 😆 cc @carbolymer @Jimbo4350 @newhoggy

[github-actions]

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 120 days.

[smelc]

cc @carbolymer @Jimbo4350 @newhoggy

[locallycompact]

Could use an answer on this before we factor this out of our repository.

[carbolymer]

I'd be for upstreaming. We can give it final shape on a PR level.

[locallycompact]

Draft here #537

[github-actions]

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 120 days.