You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
seems like this is due to TikZ not placing the isoscele triangles "half-width-center" at the lines' center,
but rather at their center of gravity or something like this. This roughly needs an xshift of 1/6 the arrows width, see below.
In addition to the symmetry desired by the original poster (arrows point in SAME direction), we also want symmetry when we have a fermion and an antifermion right above each other, with the arrows pointing in OPPOSITE directions.
This is in reference to https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/377299/tikz-feynman-asymmetry-between-particle-and-antiparticle-lines/410367#410367
Should the
xshift
of thenode
inwith reversed arrow
have the opposite sign as that inwith arrow
? Currently bothwith arrow
:tikz-feynman/tikzfeynman.keys.code.tex
Line 295 in 8d18590
and
with reversed arrow
:tikz-feynman/tikzfeynman.keys.code.tex
Line 313 in 8d18590
do
xshift=-0.5mm
, causing the asymmetry mentioned in that TeX.SX post.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: