Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump DavidAnson/markdownlint-cli2-action from 18 to 19 #90

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Bump DavidAnson/markdownlint-cli2-action from 18 to 19
Bumps [DavidAnson/markdownlint-cli2-action](https://github.com/davidanson/markdownlint-cli2-action) from 18 to 19.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/davidanson/markdownlint-cli2-action/releases)
- [Commits](DavidAnson/markdownlint-cli2-action@v18...v19)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: DavidAnson/markdownlint-cli2-action
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-major
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
dependabot[bot] authored Dec 30, 2024
commit 6675ab0d98311ce30479b46ea480ba69fe49cfea
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -21,6 +21,6 @@ jobs:
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4

- uses: DavidAnson/markdownlint-cli2-action@v18
- uses: DavidAnson/markdownlint-cli2-action@v19
with:
globs: '**/*.md'

Unchanged files with check annotations Beta

# The History of Modern Political Philosophy
The Modern in Modern Political Philosophy is not in the colloquial sense – meaning the opposite of ancient. Instead, it is a specific period of time and cultural norms that followed the renaissance. The time following the modern period is known as either postmodernity or contemporary.

Check failure on line 3 in review/the-history-of-modern-political-philosophy.md

GitHub Actions / lint

Trailing spaces

review/the-history-of-modern-political-philosophy.md:3:286 MD009/no-trailing-spaces Trailing spaces [Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1] https://github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint/blob/v0.37.2/doc/md009.md
The Modern era of political philosophy lasted from roughly the 17th to 20th century. The ranks of Philosophers from this time include some as early as Machiavelli (born 1469) and as late as Engels (born 1820). A wide range, for sure.
### Locke
Not much later, but after a long enough period for society to stabilize a bit, came John Locke. Where Hobbes equated the State of Nature with a State of War, Locke saw two distinct states for humans to exist in. During those ideal periods, the State of Nature was one where humans worked well together and with nature. They existed cooperatively and did not use more resources than they needed. Except when they did use more than necessary, or when they began to work against each other – then, they entered a State of War. Locke claimed this state was rare and could swiftly end by the administration of justice. After all, in the state of nature, we have the right to defend ourselves.

Check failure on line 27 in review/the-history-of-modern-political-philosophy.md

GitHub Actions / lint

Trailing spaces

review/the-history-of-modern-political-philosophy.md:27:688 MD009/no-trailing-spaces Trailing spaces [Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1] https://github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint/blob/v0.37.2/doc/md009.md
However, it is exactly this justice that led Locke to believe we need an authority over us. You see, Locke thinks we are pretty terrible judges when it comes to our own cases. While we are capable of ending the State of War, we tend to end it far too decisively, punishing harsher than necessary. So, we need an authority over us that can help us decide these cases fairly – keeping us out of the State of War.
### Rousseau
Hobbes and Locke wanted to improve the State of Nature by improving the State of Society based on Nature’s faults. Now, along comes Rousseau who seeks the opposite: to improve the State of Society by learning from the State of Nature. While the other philosophers saw the State of Nature as either a totally or partially problematic time, Rousseau saw it as the ideal.

Check failure on line 39 in review/the-history-of-modern-political-philosophy.md

GitHub Actions / lint

Trailing spaces

review/the-history-of-modern-political-philosophy.md:39:369 MD009/no-trailing-spaces Trailing spaces [Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1] https://github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint/blob/v0.37.2/doc/md009.md
In Rousseau’s nature, humans have pity for each other. This pity leads them to follow the Axiom of Nature which instructs each person to do what is best for them, while also doing as little harm as possible to others. Since these humans are simple, they are not specialized in any particular field, and instead know only what (and everything that) is necessary for survival. This means they do not depend on each other.

Check failure on line 41 in review/the-history-of-modern-political-philosophy.md

GitHub Actions / lint

Trailing spaces

review/the-history-of-modern-political-philosophy.md:41:420 MD009/no-trailing-spaces Trailing spaces [Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1] https://github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint/blob/v0.37.2/doc/md009.md
Since these humans only depend on nature and themselves, the only possible inequality is that which occurs naturally – the inequality of nature and chance. But when we enter a State of Society, Rousseau says we create a new type: social inequality. Social inequality only occurs between humans in society and is made of social status, reputation, and other unnatural notions.
### Purposes
The State of Nature hypothesis serves as a problem statement for each philosopher. What problem is their system solving? For Hobbes, it’s solving for the anarchy that ensues when a government loses control. For Locke, the disputes over ownership that naturally occur between people. Then it swaps for Rousseau, who begins solving not for a problem in the state of nature but in society: the lack of pity and related inequality. Similarly for Marx, who solves for the loss of the State of Nature’s simple communism by progressing society toward an advanced communism.

Check failure on line 51 in review/the-history-of-modern-political-philosophy.md

GitHub Actions / lint

Trailing spaces

review/the-history-of-modern-political-philosophy.md:51:567 MD009/no-trailing-spaces Trailing spaces [Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1] https://github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint/blob/v0.37.2/doc/md009.md
Each philosopher solves a problem in either the state of nature or the state of society by looking to the other for inspiration; either for what to strive toward or what to avoid.