Not Enough Manual Testing Test Cases

[KhoonSun47]

Not enough manual test cases in the DG for testing (the current command that can be tested is only the saving into storage and the delete command)

Suggestion: I believe that there should be sufficient test cases in the DG to cover all the commands, just like in the UG.

[nus-se-script]

Team's Response

Thanks for bringing up the issue. We think it is a good to have but does not hinder the user or tester from trying out the examples already provided in the UG and DG.

Items for the Tester to Verify

❓ Issue response

Team chose [response.NotInScope]

• I disagree

Reason for disagreement: I disagree with the classification of this response as "response.NotInScope," and I believe it should be revised to "response.Accepted" instead. 


The website explicitly states that the manual testing instructions must guide the tester through the application's features, which extend beyond deleting, launching, and shutting down. This application itself has other features that can be tested such as add, find, filter and etc...

It also specifies that the instructions should provide essential test inputs to facilitate direct application by the tester.



---