You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, patterns like A(b=1) % B(a=2) are allowed in PySB. These are examples of dangling bonds that should be illegal, and formally are in BNGL. Unfortunately, however, BNG does not currently have any code for detecting dangling bonds, so they are actually legal syntax in practice. Therefore, if a PySB rule is accidentally created with dangling bonds (which has happened, see Issue #9 ) there is nothing currently to detect and prevent this. It probably makes sense for us to implement a dangling bond detector at the PySB level since it's unclear when (if ever) this issue will be resolved in the BNG code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, patterns like A(b=1) % B(a=2) are allowed in PySB. These are examples of dangling bonds that should be illegal, and formally are in BNGL. Unfortunately, however, BNG does not currently have any code for detecting dangling bonds, so they are actually legal syntax in practice. Therefore, if a PySB rule is accidentally created with dangling bonds (which has happened, see Issue #9 ) there is nothing currently to detect and prevent this. It probably makes sense for us to implement a dangling bond detector at the PySB level since it's unclear when (if ever) this issue will be resolved in the BNG code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: