On compilation things #33
MasterInQuestion
started this conversation in
FFmpeg
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
Thanks man, I'll give it a go tomorrow c: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
[ marat569 @ CE 2024-06-25 01:01:34 UTC:
https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/issues/14377#issuecomment-2187712265
@MasterInQuestion sorry for the spam, but would you be able to build me FFmpeg with the fix in your other post please: so I could try it out?
I don't have tools setup right now to compile it myself. ]
----
@marat569, I have some writing pending on compiling random programs with GCC.
Not yet made clear for the complexity of many compilation options. (matter most of performance, compatibility)
Moreover for the arbitrariness of the compilation scripts... [1]
You could start by downloading GCC MinGW-w64 from:
https://www.mingw-w64.org/downloads/#winlibscom
(assumed Windows, for Unix-like environments typically have alike compilers bundled)
.
Don't use UCRT unless targeting Windows 10+. (or expect dependency hell of DLL)
Then you may try the instructions on:
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/CompilationGuide
Note:
https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/blob/master/configure
; expects Unix Shell. [2]
(so you would have to try Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) alike...)
[2] Most of the compilation chain, also. (e.g. "Makefile")
[ [1]
Essentially the compilation is just alike:
https://github.com/exiftool/exiftool/issues/260#issue-2254044650
.
Except it generates pre-compiled output (executable), instead of compiling on-the-fly (and run).
Invoking the compiler properly has been wrapped of many pointless layers of sophistry, typically. ]
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions