You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When using pipe! it works well with functions however often you need a combination of methods and functions. In order to make this clean and not rely on multiple pipe! invokations we should support using the unit type () in place of the value.
pipe!(val, func(),().method())
It may not bee needed however as these methods could just be chained onto the previous function call.
pipe!(val, func().method())
unsure if this is worth implementing or not. I think if I continue using the macro and it becomes an issue I will change it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When using pipe! it works well with functions however often you need a combination of methods and functions. In order to make this clean and not rely on multiple pipe! invokations we should support using the unit type
()
in place of the value.It may not bee needed however as these methods could just be chained onto the previous function call.
unsure if this is worth implementing or not. I think if I continue using the macro and it becomes an issue I will change it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: