Slower than expected with DietPi #7092
-
Hi, im doing a standard IO Test. And, its not a showstopper ;) Got a USB3 cable with a old SSD. Short: Everything what is written ist "slower" then i expact. I try to understand. Tests with Dietpi done 10 times. RaspiOS-Lite
And this is exaclty the same hardware. Fresh installed DietPi with no addons. On Raspi-Lite is running a docker with ~8 Containers.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
Now you can find the results Online. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Since firmware and kernel are the same, there is two possible reasons/differences:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Since firmware and kernel are the same, there is two possible reasons/differences:
hdparm
: Most SSDs do not support APM at all, but we had one case, where it was supported, and where the default of127
lead to slower disk I/O.127
is the highest possible value which still allows idle spin down of spinning disks, hence we set it. Does this not report an error, and have an effect on your benchmark?hdparm -B 254 /dev/sda # or even (disabling APM compeletely) hdparm -B 255 /dev/sda
schedutil
by default, while RPi OS, AFIAK, stillondemand
.schedutil
is the more modern governor, meant as successor, which is mo…