Supported tunnels / reverse proxies #56
Replies: 14 comments
-
how about glitch? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Glitch lacks support for hosting servers and port forwarding. So no, at best Glitch is for applications, not for servers. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
umm i changed the server.start(port, "localhost") to server.start(port, 10.0.0.2) and it worked |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Apparently so. Just got CloudLink 3.0 running. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Updated to add localtunnel as an option |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
If I were to run this on a VPS or a dedicated server instead of my machine, could I just connect through the IP? or? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
it should support a reverse proxy with HTTPS/TLS and must not complain about websockets |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Also, I tried using ngrok with cloudlink but it didn't work. Here's what I did. WSL client2: epicques: (unrelated to issue) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
im going to try osu!js, but well you can use CloudLink without permission. there isn't any real holdup, this is an ordinary extension. (it's in adacraft so you know he really doesn't care who uses it.) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
repl keeps saying that the client (me) is not masked , when on ip 0.0.0.0:3000 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
added cloudflared |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
converting to discussion. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
what about heroku? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Heroku works. Need to set IP to 0.0.0.0:3000. (I tested this a long time ago, so it might be different). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions