Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to simulate reservoirs in NCAR-reach configuration #769

Open
viventus0 opened this issue Aug 31, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

How to simulate reservoirs in NCAR-reach configuration #769

viventus0 opened this issue Aug 31, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@viventus0
Copy link

Hi
I am currently working on simulating reservoirs using reach-based river channels in the WRF-Hydro 5.2.0 system. I understand that WRF-Hydro version 5.1.1 introduced improvements for reservoir simulations specifically for the NCAR-reach configuration (with channel_option set to 1 or 2). However, it appears that these enhancements were not carried over to version 5.2.0.

Without these specific improvements from version 5.1.1, is it still feasible to simulate reservoirs in version 5.2.0? I have attempted to do so, but my simulations have not been successful. The model runs and generates the LAKEOUT.nc file, but there is no inflow or outflow to or from the reservoir, even though there were several heavy rainfall events. Here is how I set up the model:

  • Defined the LAKEGRID in Fulldom_hires.nc
  • Configured the dam, weir, and orifice variables in LAKEPARM.nc
  • Set UDMP_OPT = 0 in hydro.namelist

Could anyone provide guidance or suggestions on how to properly simulate reservoirs using reach-based river channels in version 5.2.0? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

@aubreyd
Copy link
Collaborator

aubreyd commented Oct 4, 2024

It appears that this capability (use of lakes with non-UDMP reach-based channel routing) was added into v5.1.1, but does not appear to be in subsequent releases. We are looking into this now. Thanks for calling this to our attention.

@aubreyd aubreyd added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 4, 2024
@viventus0
Copy link
Author

viventus0 commented Oct 6, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants