-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
rulebased.tex.backup
43 lines (34 loc) · 1.38 KB
/
rulebased.tex.backup
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
\documentclass{beamer}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{default}
\begin{document}
\begin{frame}{Rule Based System}{Peculiarity of Numerical Relations}
\begin{itemize}
\item Analyzing a number of sentences expressing numerical relations lead to several insights as already discussed. \\
\item \textbf{Keywords} We can expect presence of certain keywords that might help in identifying relations.\\
\item \textbf{Modifiers} A large number of false positives stem out of mentions where a change in the numerical attribute is mentioned.
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{Dependencies}
\begin{itemize}
\item Dependencies: Grammatical relation between two words, governer and dependent. \\
\item ``The red ball was lost'' \\
\item \begin{itemize}
\item \textbf{amod(ball,3,red,2)} ``Red'' is an adjective for ``ball''
\item \textbf{det(ball,3,The,1)} ``the'' is a determiner of ``ball''
\item \textbf{nsubjpass(lost,5,ball,3)} ``ball is the subject of lost''
\item \textbf{auxpass(lost,5,was,4)} ``was is an auxiliary of lost''
\end {itemize}
\end{itemize}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
\includegraphics[bb=0 0 1281 118,scale=0.25]{./imgs/dep.png}
% dep.png: 1281x118 pixel, 72dpi, 45.19x4.16 cm, bb=0 0 1281 118
\end{figure}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{Dependency Path Based Relation Extraction}
\begin{itemize}
\item For a Country-Number pair,
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
\end{document}