Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Negative PM2.5 #354

Open
sigmafelix opened this issue Aug 17, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Negative PM2.5 #354

sigmafelix opened this issue Aug 17, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
data help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested

Comments

@sigmafelix
Copy link
Collaborator

This is the right time to determine the way to handle negative values in PM2.5 data (cf. #7). Base learner fitting will not make sense unless the negative value problems are resolved.

According to About AQS Data,

In the past, AQS would replace the sample value with ½ of the Method Detection Limit (MDL) if the sample value was below the MDL. AQS no longer does this and historical substitutions have been removed. AQS does store sample specific MDLs where reported and the reference MDL for each method for use when the sample MDL is not reported. The user can make their own substitutions with this data, if desired.

This statement is vague on the disposition of negative values when hourly data are aggregated (it does not apply to 24-hour continuous measurements, of course). Since MDLs are different by measurement methods and devices, we'd better replace all negative values with fairly low values (1 or 2?) or just remove them.

@mitchellmanware mitchellmanware added help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested data labels Jan 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
data help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants